Monday, March 11, 2019

Arguments Against Deep Time & Evolution



For today's article we are going to go over some more problems with the theory of evolution, namely meteorites, stalactites, and diamonds. Let's begin shall we?



I will start off by stating that their are an estimated 18,000 meteorites impacting the continents every year. Now if we assume that they've been hitting earth at this rate for billions of years then there should be trillions of them throughout the sedimentary rock layers. But where are they all at? These meteorites shouldn't be so hard to find!

Next we come to stalactites. When going on tours of  caves the tour guides will claim that those stactites were formed over millions of years, however there is a 55+ year old cave that was artificially cut; It contained a bunch of approximately  25-35 ft or more stalactites. There is even an account of a bat that was encased in stalagmite, surely it would have decayed before that happened if stalactites took so long to form. Stalactites have been Photo monitored to grow up to 7 inches in only 10 days.

I have two more remarks regarding deep time and the formation of  objects before we close. It is a fact that we can grow real quality opals in only a few months. They're also indistinguishable from the natural ones. They can also make diamonds in only hours with enough heat and pressure.

The second remark is that the continents erode billions of tonnes a year. If the earth was really how old the evolutionist claim it is then there wouldn't be a visible fossil record on the earth because it would have been wiped out.

It also stands to reason that if animals were constantly changing into other kinds,  then each fossil would show changes underway all over the specimen. It would have parts in different degrees of completion. Not only that, but for every successful change there should be a multitude of changes that result in failure. This is on account of the whole process being random trial and error, with no intelligent force guiding it. So if evolution was really true then every creature, alive or dead would be covered inside and out with junk pieces and have body parts under construction.

So in conclusion Meteorites pose a problem for the theory that the earth has been around for millions of years or more. Evolutionists assume that Stalactites to a long time to form and if evolution was true animals would show signs of new kinds of body parts being built in progress as well as parts with no function.

Thanks for Reading Please Share !!!!

References: Scientific Evidences for a young Earth
(Video from North west Creation Network)
www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html

2 comments:

  1. Hi Justin,

    You might find this article to be interesting:

    https://rationalchristiandiscernment.blogspot.com/2019/03/evolution-of-human-eye.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here's an excerpt you may find interesting;

    "We all sleep. From jellyfish to frilled-neck lizards to flying squirrels to humans, the need for sleep is universal. But the biological reason why sleeplessness ultimately leads to death has always been a mystery.

    Now a paper from Bar-Ilan University published Tuesday in the journal Nature Communications presents a groundbreaking theory: that when we sleep, our nerve cells take a break from their usual function, freeing their resources to reduce DNA damage that was accumulated during wakefulness. Sleep makes no evolutionary sense in that it’s an insanely vulnerable time for the slumberer. You’re more likely to get eaten by a predator than when you’re awake. So why would we evolve to need sleep?

    It’s well established that loss of sleep affects brain performance such as memory and learning, from fruit flies to humans. This strongly argues that sleep is biochemically essential, and that sleep deprivation causes some kind of gradual systems collapse in the brain."

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/why-do-we-need-sleep-israeli-scientists-solve-the-mystery-1.6995426

    ReplyDelete