The Unreliability of "scientific" Dating Methods

Today I feel like going over the Unreliability of the dating method's Evolutionist use to come up with the ages for various rocks and fossils. Below is a chart which shows two different locations in which these dating methods took place, the second of which has multiple kinds of dating methods

Sunset Crater, Northern Arizona

K-AR date 210,000 +years                    

Reality: 1065 A.D.

Lava flows Mt. Ngaurhoe, New Zealand

K-AR date 275,000 to 3.5 Mill. years

Rb-Sr Isochron 133 mill. +or - 85 mill years

Sm-Nd Isochron 197+ or - 160 mill years

Pb-Pb 3.9 Bill. years +or - 390 Mill years        

Reality 1949, 1954, &1975 a.d

Now I will provide another Illustration that will help you grasp how we should approach the dating of rock layers and fossils of which we have to assume things such as what the initial conditions were like and that the rate hasn't changed.

With an hourglass you measure the rate and also the amount in order to calculate the time passed. You have to Assume a constant rate and initial conditions.

If you look at one hour glass with most of the sand at the bottom you assume it's been inverted a long time but if it's next to an hourglass which was inverted at the same time and has most the sand on top but if both they're rates were the same it means the initial conditions were different. Without knowing the initial conditions, the time is not an absolute ( the time is...). It's only a maximum "the time is up to". If both hourglasses started at the same time one say's it's 5 min and the other says 1 Hour you go with the youngest time.

Information Gathered from: you tube video titled

Young Earth Young Universe by Spike Psarris

Now I'm going to briefly go over the Mathmatical Impossiblity that life could have arisen by itself by random chance.

The Chance of a single Protein with 400 amino acids arising by itself is 1 in 10 (240) Power. The chance of a Single Cell arising by itself (spontaneous Formation of life) is 1 in 10 (40,000). The number of Atoms in Universe is said to be 1 in 10 (80). Now the LAW of mathematical probability states that anything smaller than 1 in 10 (50) isn't going to happen, in other words it's impossible.

Evolutions Four Fatal Flaws  Dr. Heinz Lycklama

In conclusion we can see that Carbon dating and other dating methods shouldn't be relied on to give factual or absolute ages since they rely upon assumptions to get their estimated dates. We should also reject the theory of spontaneous generation due to it's mathematical impossibility.