Today we shall be looking out into the solar system to see what they can tell us about the age of the universe. I will be going over all the planets in our solar system, as well as some of the moons in order to show that the creation that we observe appears to be quite young.
I will start off by stating that Science cannot prove or disprove historical scenarios, and that there will probably be debates over the age of the universe until the Lord comes back. In the Evolution model we have in the beginning there was gas, and 4.6 billion years ago the enormous cloud of gas collapsed and begun to swirl. Most of the gas went into the middle and formed our sun. The rest swirled around the new sun and condensed into dust as it orbited the sun. Then the dust began to stick together to form clumps of dust, then the clumps stuck together to become rocks. Eventually over time we have the little rocks sticking together to form bigger ones and eventually becoming asteroids which stuck together to form our planets.
Those asteroids that I mentioned are called planetesimals. Now here is the problem with this scenario. Clumps of dust could form in space but then nothing happens. Once you get large clumps of dust or small pebbles they don't stick together anymore instead we have them colliding to fast to stick together. So now we have them breaking each other up in collisions and the force of gravity isn't powerful enough to overcome this until after the rocks have already formed into asteroids. So in conclusion you can't get dust clumps to form into planets.
Now Let's go over the planets and find out how they are a problem for a billions of years old universe.
Mercury- is too dense for the evolution model. The only explanation that is given is that it formed right when an asteroid crashed into it, which caused it to shed off it's lighter material. The problem with this theory is that there is no proof that it happened. It has a magnetic field but that couldn't last for billions of years unless it has a dynamo deep inside. Which would mean mercury must have a liquid core to be billions of years old, the general opinion among scientist is that it is too small to have one and that it should have frozen solid eons ago.
Venus- It supposedly formed at roughly the same time, process, place, and materials as earth but is dramatically different from our planet. It's covered with lava flows, and also rains sulfuric acid. The surface of Venus appears to be young, evolutionist have to speculate that the whole planet was resurfaced by volcanic activity in the recent past, at the same time they can't figure out why or how this occured.
Earth- Our magnetic field loses about half of it's energy ever 1400 years or so. Now extrapolate this backward. This means it's strength is doubled when you go back every 1400 years, there is definitely a limit on how strong the magnetic field could have been in the past. Based on this evidence the maximum age of earth is 20,000 years. The Magnetic field protects us from lethal solar radiation and the atmosphere nurtures us. It's also interesting to not that the earth rotates at just the right speed (1 complete rotation in 24 hrs). If it rotated much slower than this it would mean extreme temperature changes, however if it were faster than this it would amount to violent winds. Evolutionist claim that our water might have came from comets however we know this to not be true because ice from comets contains mostly deuterium, but that is rare on earth.
the Moon- is responsible for raising the tides here on earth, it circulates it to prevent it from becoming stagnate. This allows fish to live there. What's really amazing is that it's just the right distance for this. Another refutation for a random chance universe is the eclipse, the moon is 400x smaller than the sun but is 400x closer to earth. That allows a perfect solar eclipse. Of the 163 discovered moons orbiting other planets none of them even come close to providing an eclipse like this. Do evolutionists think this is some coincidence?
So How did the moon get there? Let's take a look a three theories proposed by evolutionist.
1. the fission theory - states that the early earth was spinning very rapidly then a chunk of it came off and became the moon.is incorrect because lunar rocks are different than terrestrial rocks and the earth would have to been spinning about 10x faster than today, this would've raised the temperature to 1000 degrees c boiling away all water.
2. The nebula theory -which says they formed out of a cloud of gas/dust is wrong because their rocks are different.
3. The capture theory -says that the moon was formed elsewhere and got caught by earth gravity. This couldn't happen because the moon would have been accelerated by earths gravity and either hit the earth or flown by. The moon gets farther away each year. It would have been touching the earth just 1.5 billion years ago.
Mars- has the largest volcano in the solar system, and the biggest canyon too. It's atmosphere is too thin for liquid water, it would quickly freeze or evaporate. What I find Ironic is that evolutionist will mock creationist for believing a worldwide flood (even though earth is mostly covered in it today), but at the same time they believe mars used to be covered in water yet there is no evidence for this.
Jupiter's- Mass is greater than double of all other planets in our solar system combined. It spins faster than evolution models predict, once every ten hours. The evolution model said that it would lack certain elements such as argon, krypton, zenon ,nitrogen,etc, but it has lots of these. Evolution requires Jupiter's core mass to be ten times earths but in reality is only three times or smaller, in fact the probe couldn't confirm the core at all. It has been said that Jupiter needs at least ten million years to form, some calculate 100 million years. However the time available in evolution model is less than 5 million, therefore Jupiter shouldn't exist in evolution model. It has over 60 moons including:
Ganymede- This one moon alone is bigger than mercury, it's bizarre surface appears as if it was swiped by a giant paintbrush. Contrary to the evolution model it has a magnetic field.
Callisto- This is known to be the most heavily cratered object in the solar system. Callisto appears to have ice on the surface, which is evidence that erosion and geologic activity is still occurring. This is a contrast to the evolution's model that it's old/cold/dead.
Europa- is the smoothest moon in the solar system and has almost not terrain. It is covered in a shell of Ice. The impact of just one object can throw out debris and create many craters, in fact 95 % of small craters plus lots of medium ones formed this way. We can therefor conclude that fewer impacts imply a shorter period of time.
IO- It's surface is covered with volcanoes, over four hundred. one hundred and fifty of which are active. Io puts out twice as much heat as earth. Some of it comes from tidal flexing, which is caused by the gravitational force of both Jupiter and it's other moons pulling on Io. This however cannot account for all of it though. IO shouldn't have all that heat/active volcanoes if it were billions of years old. If it was four and a half billion years old it would have recycled itself through volcanoes over thirty times. Our lava is 2000 degrees, Io's lava is nearly 3000 degrees. These Temp's and densities is simply not possible after the first few million years. Io should've formed a low density crust after the higher density material sank to the inside, but it still has a higher density material on the surface.
Saturn's- magnetic field doesn't seem to be coming from a dynamo. The evolution model has what's called the migration problem. It states that Jupiter and Saturn would have migrated into the sun billions of years ago, if the gas and dust story was true. Where did Saturn get it's rings?
Enceladus- also appears to be quite young. It has an huge geyser coming from it's south pole. Enceladus is supposed to have cooled off from it's formation eons ago, and should't have the energy to do this. It is spray painting other moons with ice and snow.
Titan- it looks fuzzy cause it has an atmosphere, which is mostly nitrogen and methane. It's Saturn's largest moon. We know that sunlight breaks down methane, and there shouldn't be any more left after ten million years or so, but titan still has it. If titan was billions of years old it would have to have a source of new methane and alot of Ethane accumulated on the surface from the broken down methane. The evolutionists predicted that Titan would have a huge ocean of methane and ethane, but the probe reveals not a 1/2 mile deep ocean like the evolutionists thought but actually the surface is dry and only few inadequate lake beds around the north pole. Titan surface is solid and should have thousands of craters but only 4 have been found on the 10% that has been discovered.
Janus and Epimetheus- are called the dancing moons because they switch orbits every 4 years.
Uranus- What's strange about this planet is that it's north and south poles are on the sides and it rolls like a ball. The nebula theory states that it is impossible to have formed this way, did an asteroid knock it over? Then why does it orbit the sun almost perfectly? Uranus has over 24 moons that rotate around it by going above and below it instead of from one side to the other. Here is a conundrum. The moons could not have formed before the collision because they would not be were they are today, but they could not have formed after the collision because Uranus was already formed when the collision occurred, not during because the orbits are too regular. It's the only Jovian planet that doesn't generate energy into space, it does however have a magnetic field.
Miranda- It's surface looks so bizarre! what could have possible happened to it?...5 asteroid collisions?
Neptune- Radiates twice as much energy into space than it receives from the sun, it doesn't look old, cold, or dead. It has the strongest winds of anywhere measured in the solar system 1300 mph. In 1989 voyager 2 picked up a dark spot, but in 1994 it was gone! Then in 1995 a new one has been discovered. Neptune has a magnetic field similar to Uranus, which is tilted and offset.
Computer simulations's haven't explained how planets as big as these two gas giants could have formed so far away from the sun. Their bodies orbit so slowly in the outskirts of the suns protoplanetary disk that gravitational accretion would require more time than the alleged age of our solar system to form bodies 14.5 and 17.1 x the mass of earth. It turns out that you would need 10 billion years for Neptune to form, supposedly twice the age of the solar system. This has been known since 1972. According to their theory Uranus and Neptune shouldn't exist
Trans-Neptunian objects- have fresh ice on them apparently from volcanic eruptions, if billions of years old they would not be geologically active. The tempature out there is about negative three hundred and seventy they should have frozen solid eons ago.
Comets- are Destroyed by being burned up or smashing into the sun or other planets, or thrown out of the solar system completely. Evolutionist say new comets haven't formed for billions of years. They also know that they can't last for billions of years. So the question remains why do we still have comets. Evolutionists believe in something called an oort cloud that contains numerous comets even though they can't see it. The kuiper belt is a disc of comet nuclei orbiting in the TNO area. This model however doesn't work either.
NASA recently examined comets with probes and the evidence showed that they didn't form where the evolutionist predicted. they posses very little to no volatile materials, and are made up of silicus; which their model says can't be out there where comets where supposedly born. The nuclei required by the billion years model is 85 but we found only 3. So evolutionists have no source for short period comets therefore they can't explain how we still have comets today.
The Information in this article was derived from a video call "our created solar system"
No comments:
Post a Comment